Last week, I was queuing for an ice-cream on Southbourne beach. While waiting, two people in front of me were discussing how great the past 12 months had been for them financially. In effect, they were discussing how they were working full time but were also on furlough. They were, to directly quote them, “quids in”.
Are “side-hustles” – where an employee has a second job on the side of their main job – allowed?
The starting point for both HR and employees will be the employment contract or any relevant staff policies. It is common for contracts – particularly those of senior employees – to expressly forbid outside interests, unless the employer agrees to them. The government’s furlough scheme is fine with those on furlough working elsewhere, if it’s acceptable to the employer (and usually a furlough agreement will say whether or not it is, particularly if it’s not already covered off in the employment contract).
If the side-hustle is in breach of a restriction placed on the employee then disciplinary action or even dismissal may be appropriate depending on the circumstances. If an employee has at least two years’ continuous service, the business will have to ensure that it has a fair reason and has followed a fair process before dismissing, or else the employee may have a viable claim.
Employees sometimes ask whether they must share with their employer the fact they have a second job. This also depends on the employment contract. If they don’t have it already, an employer may want to consider inserting a provision into their contracts which places an employee under an obligation to disclose other jobs. This could be for a number of reasons, including:
Were the beachgoers in the ice-cream queue doing anything wrong? Well, many employers have taken a relaxed view to their employees having other jobs whilst on furlough, provided they are available to return and work as soon as required. On the basis that there were no contractual provisions preventing it or any requirement to tell their employer, then they were probably right to be “quids in”.
If you are a football fan and interested in employment law, you will no doubt have been eagerly awaiting the outcome of Benjamin Mendy’s claim that his former club, Manchester City (“City”), unlawfully made deductions from his wages. As Employment Judge Dunlop (“EJ Dunlop”) said: “I am fairly…
…Following an appeal by USDAW, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal and granted the injunction sought by USDAW…
From 26 October 2024, employers will be subject to a new proactive duty to take “reasonable steps” to prevent sexual harassment of all their employees in the course of their employment
In February 2024 the then government published a statutory Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement, and this came into force on 18 July 2024. “Dismissal and re-engagement”, as it is called by employment lawyers, is a tool used by employers