In an article in Cosmetics Business, Waterfront associate Maria-Elena Cacace explains that investigations into counterfeit cosmetics have revealed that they can contain harmful carcinogens, such as toxic heavy metals like lead and mercury, chemicals including arsenic, beryllium and cadmium, and even human and animal excrement.
She emphasises that exposure to toxic ingredients can result in skin rashes, chemical burns and even organ damage, as well as harm to the nervous, immune and digestive systems and eyes.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has said that the international trade in counterfeit goods and pirated products amounts to one fortieth of world trade. In the article, Maria-Elena refers to the findings of the UK Intellectual Property Office “IP Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022 to 2027’’, which reported that counterfeiting had grown to be the second largest source of criminal income worldwide – second only to drugs.
She adds that until recently there has not been a huge demand for criminal sanctions to protect intellectual property rights. But the last 20 years have seen many recognising the need for heavier criminal penalties, due partly to the rise of e-commerce.
Maria-Elena also outlines the types of offence that relate to counterfeiting and the approach that needs to be taken by those who fall victim to it.
You can read the full article by visiting this link. (Subscription required)
The current legal framework in the UK does not allow copying of copyright-protected material for training generative AI models, except where it is carried out with permission of the copyright owner or done in a research or study context and for purely non-commercial purposes.
This matter deals with the Claimant’s (‘TVIS’) allegation of infringement and misrepresentation in relation to its “VETSURE” trade mark by the Defendant (‘Howserv’s’) “PETSURE” trade mark, used for pet insurance. In the first instance decision, the claim was dismissed due to the marks being highly descriptive and “not…