In Athleta v. Sports Group Denmark & Anr [2024] EWHC 2449 (Ch), David Stone, sitting as a deputy High Court Judge, considered infringement of the sign ‘ATHLETA’ by the sign ‘ATHLECIA’, both used predominantly for clothing.
The Judge concluded that, in light of the highly descriptive element ‘ATHLE-’, the average consumer would not confuse the signs, despite them being highly similar on an aural, visual and conceptual basis.
He went on to find, however, that there would be confusion when each sign was used in conjunction with a similar roundels, positioned in the same place, relative to the signs (i.e. and ). He found, however, that moving the roundel above the sign ‘ATHLECIA’ or placing it on a garment in a position entirely removed from the sign ‘ATHLECIA’ would avoid the risk of any confusion.
This leaves Sports Group Denmark free to reintroduce and develop its athleisure brand ‘ATHLECIA’ in the United Kingdom.
Jamie Muir Wood, instructed by Piers Strickland of Waterfront Law, appeared for Sports Group Denmark.
The current legal framework in the UK does not allow copying of copyright-protected material for training generative AI models, except where it is carried out with permission of the copyright owner or done in a research or study context and for purely non-commercial purposes.
This matter deals with the Claimant’s (‘TVIS’) allegation of infringement and misrepresentation in relation to its “VETSURE” trade mark by the Defendant (‘Howserv’s’) “PETSURE” trade mark, used for pet insurance. In the first instance decision, the claim was dismissed due to the marks being highly descriptive and “not…
…the online influential parenting platform, Mumsnet, has launched a legal complaint against OpenAI, the developer of chatbot ChatGPT, accusing the AI company of scraping billions of words and content from the site without consent…