A recent UKIPO decision in the Wordle Trade Mark Dispute highlights just how far trade mark law has evolved in response to digital products, viral growth, and platform-driven brand value.
On 28 January 2026, the UKIPO (United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office) issued its decision in a dispute between Stefan Heine and The New York Times Company (The New York Times Company), both asserting competing rights in the mark WORDLE.
At the heart of the case was a simple but increasingly common question: who owns a brand that becomes globally famous before traditional commercial metrics even exist?
Stefan Heine held an international registration designating the UK for the mark WORDLE (classes 16, 28 and 41), registered in 2022.
Meanwhile, the New York Times had acquired the viral word puzzle Wordle from its creator, Josh Wardle (Josh Wardle), who originally launched the game in 2021 before its rapid global rise and subsequent acquisition by NYT in January 2022.
What followed was a series of competing proceedings. NYT sought to invalidate Heine’s registration, and Heine opposed NYT’s UK application for WORDLE.
A key argument in the case was whether the New York Times could rely on goodwill in the absence of traditional commercial indicators such as sales, turnover, or advertising spend.
Heine challenged the existence of goodwill on several grounds, including:
These arguments were ultimately rejected.
The UKIPO accepted that goodwill can arise rapidly and does not depend on conventional financial indicators. Instead, it can be demonstrated through public recognition and market impact.
The tribunal found that goodwill had been established and had vested in the New York Times following its acquisition of the game.
It also found a likelihood of misrepresentation, noting visual and contextual associations between the parties’ use of the mark and the original Wordle branding.
On bad faith, the tribunal applied the framework from Alexander Trade Mark (BL O/036/18), asking whether the applicant was pursuing an improper objective through the filing.
The UKIPO concluded that the application was inconsistent with honest commercial practices and therefore made in bad faith.
The New York Times succeeded in its invalidation action in full, resulting in Heine’s registration being invalidated.
As a consequence, the opposition brought against The New York Times’ own WORDLE trade mark application did not require further consideration.
This decision confirms that goodwill is a flexible concept in modern trade mark law and may be evidenced through user engagement, media coverage, and cultural penetration, rather than financial performance alone.
It also reinforces that trade mark filings must reflect genuine commercial intent. Attempts to secure rights in already-established digital brands will be closely scrutinised.
This case reflects a broader shift in IP law: brand value is increasingly created in digital ecosystems long before traditional monetisation occurs.
For businesses operating in fast-moving digital markets, it highlights that:
As digital products continue to scale globally within days or weeks, disputes like this are likely to become far more common.
Want to discuss the topics covered in this article? Reach out to Francesca Allport.
Intellectual Property