Recently our Head of Employment, Anthony Purvis, was called on by a multi-national software business to resolve a dispute with an employee.
It had started as a relatively straightforward redundancy process. The company wanted to cut costs, so it proposed the removal of one of its senior roles in the UK. The individual was put at risk of redundancy and a consultation process was planned. In addition, the company had decided to offer a generous enhanced redundancy package and, as standard, the employee was required to take independent legal advice on its terms.
Unexpectedly for the employer, the individual – through his lawyer – decided to negotiate from a very aggressive position. Serious allegations of unfairness and unlawful discrimination were made and a counter-offer was put forward, which was several times higher than the redundancy package offered.
At that point, we were asked by the client’s HR team and management to help. We advised the client on its position and its options before responding robustly to the other party’s lawyer, by arguing on multiple grounds why the claims were misconceived and over-valued.
The negotiation was hard-fought but we managed to:
At the end of the matter, we were pleased to have a happy client. If you find yourself in a similar situation – either as the employer or employee – our team are available for a free no-obligation chat to see how we can help.
Some of the details of the matter have been changed in order to prevent identification of the parties involved.
For World Mental Health Day 2025 we’ve put together five tips for employers and managers…
UK Supreme Court to rule on AI patent law: Can artificial neural networks be patented? Emotional Perception case could reshape UK IP landscape.
This article briefly considers the Upper Tribunal’s (UT) decision in the case of George Mantides…