In Athleta v. Sports Group Denmark & Anr [2024] EWHC 2449 (Ch), David Stone, sitting as a deputy High Court Judge, considered infringement of the sign ‘ATHLETA’ by the sign ‘ATHLECIA’, both used predominantly for clothing.
The Judge concluded that, in light of the highly descriptive element ‘ATHLE-’, the average consumer would not confuse the signs, despite them being highly similar on an aural, visual and conceptual basis.
He went on to find, however, that there would be confusion when each sign was used in conjunction with a similar roundels, positioned in the same place, relative to the signs (i.e. and ). He found, however, that moving the roundel above the sign ‘ATHLECIA’ or placing it on a garment in a position entirely removed from the sign ‘ATHLECIA’ would avoid the risk of any confusion.
This leaves Sports Group Denmark free to reintroduce and develop its athleisure brand ‘ATHLECIA’ in the United Kingdom.
Jamie Muir Wood, instructed by Piers Strickland of Waterfront Law, appeared for Sports Group Denmark.
In a report published last week, the Tony Blair Institute urged the UK to relax…
On 20th January 2025, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Thatchers Cider Company…
As we begin 2025, the emergence and growth of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) shows no signs…
The current legal framework in the UK does not allow copying of copyright-protected material for training generative AI models, except where it is carried out with permission of the copyright owner or done in a research or study context and for purely non-commercial purposes.